Dynamics of Markets: The New Financial Economics

(3 customer reviews)

$32.79

Author(s)

Format

PDF

Pages

286

Published Date

2009

500 People watching this product now!
Description

Dynamics of Markets provides a careful introduction to stochastic methods along with approximate ensembles for a single, historic time series. This book explains the history leading up to the biggest economic disaster of the 21st century. Empirical evidence for finance market instability under deregulation is given, together with a history of the explosion of the US Dollar worldwide. A model shows how bounds set by a central bank stabilized FX in the gold standard era, illustrating the effect of regulations.

Author’s Note:

This book provides a thorough introduction to econophysics and finance market theory, and leads the reader from the basics to the frontiers of research. These are good times for econophysics with emphasis on market instability, and bad times for the standard economic theory that teaches stable equilibrium of markets. I now explain how the new volume differs in detail from the first edition.

The first edition of Dynamics of Markets (2004) was based largely on our discovery of diffusive dynamics of the exponential model, and more generally on the dynamics of Markovian models with variable diffusion coefficients. Since that time, the progress by the University of Houston Group (Kevin Bassler, Gemunu Gunaratne, and me) has produced a far more advanced market dynamics theory based on our initial discovery. The present book includes our discoveries since 2004.

In particular, we’ve understood the limitations of scaling and one-point densities: given a scaling process, only the one-point density can scale, the transition density and all higher-order densities do not and cannot scale, and a one-point density (as Ha¨ nggi and Thomas pointed out over 30 years ago) cannot be used to identify an underlying stochastic process. Even pair correlations do not scale. It follows that scaling cannot be used to determine the dynamics that generated a time series. In particular, scaling is not an indication of long time correlations, and we exhibit scaling Markov models to illustrate that point. Our focus in this edition is therefore on the pair correlations and transition densities for stochastic processes, representing the minimum level of knowledge required to identify (or rule out) a class of stochastic processes.

The central advances are our 2007 foreign exchange (FX) data analysis, and the Martingale diffusion theory that it indicates. We therefore focus from the start on the pair correlations of stochastic processes needed to understand and characterize a class of stochastic processes. The form of the pair correlations tells us whether we’re dealing with Martingale dynamics, or with the dynamics of long time pair correlations like fractional Brownian motion. The stochastic processes with pair correlations agreeing empirically with detrended finance data are Martingales, and the addition of drift to a Martingale yields an Ito process. We therefore emphasize Ito processes, which are diffusive processes with uncorrelated noise increments. Stated otherwise, the Martingale is the generalization of the Wiener process to processes with general (x,t)-dependent diffusion coefficients. In physics x denotes position; in finance and macroeconomics x denotes the logarithm of a price.

A much more complete development of the theory of diffusive stochastic processes is provided in this text than in the first edition, with simple examples showing how to apply Ito calculus. We show that stationary markets cannot be efficient, and vice versa, and show how money could systematically be made with little or no risk by betting in a stationary market. The Dollar on the gold standard provides the illuminating example.

The efficient market hypothesis is derived as a Martingale condition from the absence of influence of the past on the future at the level of pair correlations. Because of non-stationarity, the analysis of an arbitrary time series is nontrivial. We show how to construct an approximate ensemble for a single historic time series like finance data, and then show how a class of dynamical models can be deduced from the statistical ensemble analysis. Our new FX data analysis is discussed in detail, showing that the dynamics in log returns is a Martingale after a time lag of 10 minutes in intraday trading, and we show how spurious stylized facts are generated by a common but wrong method of data analysis based on time averages.

Contents:

  • Econophysics: why and what
  • Neo-classical economic theory
  • Probability and stochastic processes
  • Introduction to financial economics
  • Introduction to portfolio selection theory
  • Scaling, pair correlations, and conditional densities
  • Statistical ensembles: deducing dynamics from time series
  • Martingale option pricing
  • FX market globalization: evolution of the Dollar to worldwide reserve currency
  • Macroeconomics and econometrics: regression models vs empirically based modeling
  • Complexity
Dynamics of Markets: The New Financial Economics By Joseph L. McCauley pdf
4
3 reviews
1
1
1
0
0

3 reviews for Dynamics of Markets: The New Financial Economics

Clear filters
  1. Alejandro Morse (verified owner)

    good book

  2. Brian Stewart (verified owner)

    So, I am an economist. I have sympathies with the econophysics literature and community. However, this book is guilty of the worst vices of that community. There are two I wish to point out.

    The book’s treatment of neoclassical economics is awful! Truly awful. The author concedes that his understanding of neoclassical economics is based on Hal Varian’s Intermediate Microeconomics textbook. There is no admission that this is the textbook economists use to introduce the formalism of neoclassical economics. It is the first textbook students will see that treats utility and profit maximization. Varian’s book spends almost all its time on static consumer and producer problems, which are not realistic. But, you don’t introduce students to the cutting edge research that attempts to handle all the realistic details that we currently can. You simplify the crap out of everything so that students can develop aptitude and sophistication. Yet, our author accuses economists of believing that Varian’s Intermediate Micro represents what we believe.

    He makes some glaring claims that are categorically false. For instance, neoclassical economics can’t handle capital accumulation. If one looked at Acemoglu’s Intro to Modern Economic Growth Theory, Aghion and Howitt’s Endogenous Growth Theory, Romer’s Advanced Macro or any other graduate textbook, you would see that neoclassical economics does handle capital accumulation. Our Author is ignorant of the Solow model, which handled capital accumulation in the 1950s. He also claims that neoclassical econ can handle money. This is also disingenuous at best. Walsh’s textbook on Monetary policy and theory is definitely in the neoclassical tradition. It handles money.

    The summary here is that readers should skip chapter 2. There are some tidbits that I agree with (the existence of equilibrium is not enough; how we get there from where we are is important too), but there are lots of just sloppy statements (economists assume equilibrium exists; no we prove equilibrium exists when certain conditions are satisfied. We assume that the market is in that equilibrium), ignorant claims (We can’t empirically construct utility functions; economists have known this since the 1950s), or downright falsehoods (see the above paragraph). So, skip chapter 2. It is not worth reading.

    My second point of contention is that econophysicists don’t realize that their notation is different from what everyone else uses. They also have very sloppy derivations of many mathematical statements. Economists learned stochastic calculus from mathematicians. Mathematicians are marvelously pedantic when it comes to notation. Physicists are not; they are actually somewhat infamous for sloppy notation. This book is no exception to that trend. Econophysicists could go a long way to remedy this situation by just putting a glossary of notations they use and explaining their derivations a lot better.

    I personally think the econophysics research program should be more influential in economics and finance. The issues outlined above keep economists from trying to learn any of what the econophysicists are putting out. It is a shame. There is value in the collaboration. But, physicists, much like economists, are arrogant and stubborn and refuse to actually learn any of the economics that is done.

  3. Maya Cunningham (verified owner)

    Awesome! The technical portions of the book are non-trivial and really require advanced training in mathematics and / or physics. However, the implications are clear and their exposition relatively approachable give the technical content. More economists should read this!

Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.